top of page
logo-2-color_2x.png

Antarctica Explainer Video Project

Points: 

200

Due By:

May 8, 2026 at 4:59:00 AM

Overview

Working in production teams, you will research and produce a documentary-style explainer video for the UTA Special Collections. Your goal is to bring a static archival map to life by telling the story of an expedition, scientific discovery, or mythology connected to Antarctica.






Important Dates

  • Rough Cut Due: Tuesday, April 28

  • Final Video Due: Thursday, May 7.







Key Requirement: Person + Place + Thing

Your video must clearly integrate:

  • Person → Explorer, scientist, or historical figure

  • Place → Specific Antarctic location

  • Thing → Object, concept, or discovery


⚠️ These must be woven into one cohesive narrative, not three separate sections.





Project Specifications

  • Length: 3–5 minutes

  • Style: Documentary / explainer video

  • Must include:

    • Animated maps

    • Voiceover narration

    • Kinetic typography






Required Skills & Techniques


Editing Techniques (Use at least 3)

  • Jump cuts

  • Match cuts

  • Cut on action

  • Speed changes (slow motion / time-lapse)

  • Sound design (audio layering, effects, ambience)



Visual Storytelling

  • Camera framing

  • Camera angles

  • Simulated camera movement



Preproduction

  • Script writing

  • Storyboard OR planning document







Team Roles

Teams will divide responsibilities across:

  • Research & Scriptwriting

  • Asset Design (maps, graphics, typography)

  • Animation

  • Editing & Post-Production






Deliverables

  • Final video (3–5 minutes)

  • Script (voiceover text)

  • Preproduction materials (storyboard, shot list, or planning doc)

  • Team contribution documentation






Grading Criteria


Category

Excellent (A)

Proficient (B–C)

Needs Improvement (D–F)

Points

Content & Research

Information is accurate and clearly explained. Uses multiple credible sources. The person, place, and thing are explicitly connected and explained as part of one cohesive story.

Information is mostly accurate but may be surface-level or uneven. Person/place/thing are present but connections are not fully explained.

Information is limited, unclear, or inaccurate. Person/place/thing are missing, unclear, or treated as separate ideas.

40

Storytelling & Script

Script has a clear beginning, middle, and end. Voiceover is easy to follow, well-paced, and directly supports visuals. The main idea is clear throughout.

Script structure is present but may feel uneven or unclear in parts. Voiceover may be too fast/slow or loosely connected to visuals.

Script is disorganized or difficult to follow. Voiceover is unclear, missing, or does not support the visuals.

40

Visual Design & Animation

Visuals (maps, graphics, typography) are clear, readable, and consistently styled. Animation helps explain ideas (e.g., movement, zoom, emphasis). Visuals directly support the content.

Visuals are present but may be inconsistent, cluttered, or occasionally unclear. Animation is basic or not always meaningful.

Visuals are unclear, missing, or distracting. Little to no effective use of maps, typography, or animation.

40

Editing & Technical Execution

Includes at least 3 required editing techniques, used to improve clarity, pacing, or emphasis. Transitions are smooth. Audio is clear and balanced. Sound design adds meaning or atmosphere.

Includes required techniques but they may feel forced, inconsistent, or not clearly connected to the story. Some pacing or audio issues.

Missing required techniques or techniques are ineffective. Poor pacing, abrupt transitions, or distracting audio issues.

50

Preproduction Planning

Complete script AND clear planning document (storyboard, shot list, or outline). Plan shows how visuals, narration, and structure fit together. Final video follows the plan.

Script and planning materials are present but lack detail or do not fully match the final video.

Little or no planning materials submitted. Script or plan is incomplete or unclear.

30







Team Contributions


Category

Excellent (A)

Proficient (B–C)

Needs Improvement (D–F)

Points

Contribution & Collaboration

Clear documentation of roles and completed work. Peer evaluations indicate consistent effort and collaboration. All members contribute meaningfully.

Some uneven contribution or limited documentation. Peer feedback indicates moderate participation.

Minimal contribution, missing documentation, or negative peer evaluations. Lack of collaboration.

50


Locked Message

bottom of page