top of page
logo-2-color_2x.png

High-Fidelity Mockup Flows

Points: 

50

Due By:

March 25, 2026 at 4:45:00 AM

Table of Contents




Overview

Continue the product work from your Structural Blueprint assignment and convert it into three high-fidelity mockup flows in Figma.

Your three required flows are:

  • Linear Path

  • Progressive Disclosure

  • IA-Driven Alternative


These should all come from the same product and build directly on last week’s structure, rather than starting over with a new idea. The previous assignment already established hierarchy, grouping, and structural logic, so this week focuses on carrying that work forward into a more developed visual system.






Deliverable

Submit one Figma file that includes:


1. Three high-fidelity flows

You must include:

  • one Linear Path flow

  • one Progressive Disclosure flow

  • one IA-Driven Alternative flow


2. A simple visual system

Your file should show:

  • a typographic system

  • a color system

  • an icon system


3. Reusable Figma elements

Your file must include:

  • text styles

  • color styles and/or variables

  • icons turned into components






What each flow means


Linear Path

A clear step-by-step flow with minimal branching.


Progressive Disclosure

A flow that reveals information gradually, instead of showing everything at once.


IA-Driven Alternative

A flow that reorganizes the information architecture or navigation logic in a meaningful way.

The goal is to explore three different structural approaches while keeping one consistent visual language.






What successful completion looks like

To complete this assignment successfully, make sure your file does the following:

  • continues directly from your Structural Blueprint

  • includes all three required flows

  • uses one consistent visual language across all flows

  • shows a clear type hierarchy

  • uses color intentionally and consistently

  • uses a coherent set of icons

  • turns repeated icons into components

  • includes realistic content rather than filler text

  • is organized clearly in Figma


A strong submission should feel like one product explored through three different flow structures.






What to include in your Figma file

A simple structure is enough:


Page 1 — Overview

  • project name

  • labels for the three flow types


Page 2 — Visual System

  • text styles

  • color styles and/or variables

  • icon set

  • icon components


Page 3 — Linear Path

Page 4 — Progressive Disclosure

Page 5 — IA-Driven Alternative

You can add an extra page for notes or states if needed, but it is not required.






Grading Criteria


1. Continuation from Structural Blueprint - 20%

The work clearly and obviously builds on last week’s product and structure.


2. Completion of all three flows - 20%

All three required flow types are present and clearly differentiated.


3. Visual system - 20%

The file includes a clear typographic system, color system, and icon system.


4. Consistency - 15%

All three flows feel like part of the same product.


5. Figma setup - 15%

The file includes text styles, color styles and/or variables, and icon components.


6. Clarity and realism - 10%

The content is specific enough to reveal actual hierarchy, spacing, and layout decisions.





Simple Rubric

Excellent

  • All three flows are complete and clearly distinct

  • The work builds directly from the Structural Blueprint

  • Typography, color, and icons are consistent across all flows

  • Repeated icons are built as components

  • The Figma file is organized and easy to review

  • The work feels ready to support the next assignment


Good

  • All three flows are present

  • The connection to the Structural Blueprint is mostly clear

  • The visual system is mostly consistent

  • Some reusable Figma elements are set up correctly

  • The file is understandable, with minor inconsistencies


Satisfactory

  • Most required parts are present, but one area is underdeveloped

  • Flow differences are somewhat unclear

  • The visual system is inconsistent or incomplete

  • Figma styles/components are only partially set up

  • The file works, but needs stronger organization or consistency


Needs Revision

  • One or more required flows are missing

  • The work does not clearly continue from the Structural Blueprint

  • Visual decisions are inconsistent or screen-by-screen

  • Required Figma setup is missing

  • The submission is difficult to review







Examples From Previous Semesters


The examples below are meant to give you an idea of what 1 single flow might look like and how much detail is contained.


These were all solid, but not perfect. Your goal should be to match and exceed.




Locked Message

bottom of page